I can't believe what happened in these 2 days.
You say you respect my views. And then you turn around and tell me that my views are 'bull'.
You say I don't respect your views and am trying to change your point of view. My entry wasn't even directed at you. My entry was written even before I read your opinion. Please do not think that everything is directed towards you because it is NOT. I listen to other people as well. Ie Jill. I talk to other people about the war as well.
What you say honestly does not make sense to me. Of course, if 'insisting on my views' meant that I am giving my argument and explanation, then I comprehend. If 'directing you to my angle' meant that I am telling my viewpoint, then I comprehend. And in your own words, 'If you think I'm personal, so what if I am?' This is my personal blog. And if you took time to read, I did not try to change anybody's view. In all respect, I do not think that you see both sides of the story, because, again, in your own words, 'That's why when I heard that he was not anti-guns, I totally stopped listening to his crap.'. That was in your own words, you remember.
Also, I do not think that you should regard my entry to be directed against you. For I know that you can get 'misinformed' and I 'should not rely on you to get facts'. That, again, is in your own words.
My views are based on what I think and what my forum board is discussing. Please do not assume that I am writing about you. My views are what I think. I am not a dictator; If you took time to read my entry, you will see that I didn't even try to change anybody's viewpoint. Why is it when you write, it's your viewpoint, and when I write, it's considered trying to change your viewpoint?
I can't write anything anymore without my words being scrutinized to the last bit.
*Whew! I got through this civil and polite enough. Lol. It wasn't always the case. I was pretty riled up. And this is what I wrote, after deciding to chuck the offensive one over to my other site. That's where the truth always is.
You say you respect my views. And then you turn around and tell me that my views are 'bull'.
You say I don't respect your views and am trying to change your point of view. My entry wasn't even directed at you. My entry was written even before I read your opinion. Please do not think that everything is directed towards you because it is NOT. I listen to other people as well. Ie Jill. I talk to other people about the war as well.
What you say honestly does not make sense to me. Of course, if 'insisting on my views' meant that I am giving my argument and explanation, then I comprehend. If 'directing you to my angle' meant that I am telling my viewpoint, then I comprehend. And in your own words, 'If you think I'm personal, so what if I am?' This is my personal blog. And if you took time to read, I did not try to change anybody's view. In all respect, I do not think that you see both sides of the story, because, again, in your own words, 'That's why when I heard that he was not anti-guns, I totally stopped listening to his crap.'. That was in your own words, you remember.
Also, I do not think that you should regard my entry to be directed against you. For I know that you can get 'misinformed' and I 'should not rely on you to get facts'. That, again, is in your own words.
My views are based on what I think and what my forum board is discussing. Please do not assume that I am writing about you. My views are what I think. I am not a dictator; If you took time to read my entry, you will see that I didn't even try to change anybody's viewpoint. Why is it when you write, it's your viewpoint, and when I write, it's considered trying to change your viewpoint?
I can't write anything anymore without my words being scrutinized to the last bit.
*Whew! I got through this civil and polite enough. Lol. It wasn't always the case. I was pretty riled up. And this is what I wrote, after deciding to chuck the offensive one over to my other site. That's where the truth always is.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home